Skip to main content

Memory Courtroom

Courtroom is the evidence workspace for a memory. It shows deterministic guardrails first and MiniMax judgment as secondary analysis.

What Courtroom should show​

  • Deterministic verdict and final verdict.
  • Trust bucket and component reasons.
  • Evidence references and redacted excerpts.
  • Temporal state, supersession, and contradictions.
  • Entity links and graph relationships.
  • Google Memory Bank comparison state when available.
  • MiniMax rationale, missing evidence, risks, and cross-exam questions.

MiniMax can downgrade trust or request review, but it cannot upgrade forbidden rows such as rejected, stale, forensic, test/eval, secret-like, or superseded memory.

Why this is different​

Many memory systems expose retrieval scores, metadata, or benchmark-time LLM judging. Courtroom is runtime evidence for a specific memory. It answers the operator questions that matter after a surprising recall:

  • Was this memory allowed by deterministic policy?
  • Which source evidence supports it?
  • Is it current, historical, superseded, or contradicted?
  • Did MiniMax judge the content, and did that judgment downgrade or only explain the deterministic verdict?
  • Was Google Memory Bank evidence available, unavailable, or conflicting?

The final verdict is always guardrail-first. AI judgment and managed-memory comparison are supporting evidence, not bypasses.

Next steps​